What was advertised in a revolutionary American newspaper 250 years ago this week?

“Self-defence against unjust attacks needs no apology.”
It was the final volley in the battle over competing editions of Thomas Paine’s Common Sense that took place in newspapers advertisements in Philadelphia over a course of a month in late January and most of February 1776. The author and Robert Bell, the publisher of the first edition, had a parting of the ways over Bell’s bookkeeping for the first edition. Paine claimed that he wished to donate his share of the proceeds to purchase mittens for American soldiers participating in the invasion of Canada, but Bell somehow had not turned a profit. That prompted Paine to work with William Bradford and Thomas Bradford, the printers of the Pennsylvania Journal, on an expanded edition. Bell published an unauthorized second edition. Paine, who remained anonymous at that point, and Bell attacked each other in newspaper advertisements. The author walked away, but Bell continued and the Bradfords joined the fray. When Aitken learned that the Bradfords’ edition would feature new material, he published his own “ADDITIONS to Common Sense.” The Bradfords warned that Bell’s new pamphlet “consists of Pieces taken out of News Papers, and not written by the Author of COMMON SENSE.” Several newspapers carried some of these advertisements; the Pennsylvania Evening Post carried all of them. Printed three times a week instead of just once (in contrast to the other newspapers published in Philadelphia at t the time), the Pennsylvania Evening Post allowed the feuding printers to publish speedy responses to the latest accusations leveled against them.
Bell inserted the last of those responses in the February 22 edition of the Pennsylvania Evening Post and the February 26 edition of Dunlap’s Pennsylvania Packet. In Thomas Paine: A Bibliographical Check List of Common Sense with an Account of Its Publication, Richard Gimbel notes that Bell “thought so much of this address that he had it separately printed as a two-page leaflet and added it, as an integral part, to his ‘complete’ edition of Common Sense.”[1] In this advertisement, Bell presented himself as a performing his civic dry as a “Bookseller, to the Public.” He entitled this new address, “Self-defence against unjust attacks needs no apology.” He then disparaged Paine, the “envious Mr. ANONYMOUS,” for wanting to have all the attention for writing Common Sense when other authors, “worthy and respectables citizens of Philadelphia,” also penned “excellent pieces.” Furthermore, “in the opinion of some gentlemen, who are good judges of literary merit,” those essays were “worthy of preservation, in such manner as to bind with other pamphlets in an octavo volume.” Why should readers limit themselves to Common Sense alone when they considered current events when they could instead consult an entire compendium of essays that supported the American cause? Paine, his intermediaries who negotiated with Bell, and the printers who worked with him attempted to “insinuate,” according to Bell, that there is no WRITERS in America but the would-be-author of Common Sense.” Yet Paine had been influenced by others, so any acclaim he received amounted to nothing more than “stolen applause.” In addition, the publisher framed the production and, especially, the dissemination of Common Sense as his work. After all, Paine did not attach his name to the pamphlet and most printers initially did not want to be associated with such a revolutionary tract, but Bell “printed his name on the title of the flaming production, to sound the depths of the multitude for a virtuous and glorious independency.” “Mr. ANONYMOUS” wrote the pamphlet, but it was Bell who deserved credit for presenting it to the world. He concluded by proclaiming that he “continueth to sell to all who are capable of making proper distinctions, the large edition of Common Sense with ALL the additions and improvements.” That volume included “the appendix, and address to the Quakers COMPLETE,” pieces written by Bell for the Bradfords’ expanded edition and pirated by Bell. Gimbel contends that this “acrimonious quarrel” in newspaper advertisements “doubtless helped to make Paine’s Common Sense the most discussed and most widely circulated pamphlet in America.”[2] Then, as now, everyone loved a controversy. The dispute gave readers all the more reason to check out the pamphlet.
**********
[1] Richard Gimbel, Thomas Paine: A Bibliographical Check List of Common Sense with an Account of Its Publication (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1956), 47.
[2] Gimbel, Thomas Paine: A Bibliographical Check List of Common Sense, 49.




























